Technical Insight
IHT on pensions… time to consolidate?
As pensions enter the IHT net, is it time to rethink how clients organise their plans?
id
With most pensions coming into scope for Inheritance Tax (IHT) from April 2027, not only will the revenue raised increase but the task of dealing with the estate will become more burdensome.
Pension planning can no longer be viewed in isolation from estate planning. It also raises a practical question for clients where they hold several pension arrangements – would consolidation now help simplify things for their family and legal personal representatives (LPRs)?
From April 2027 they will need to include all pension arrangements (other than excluded benefits) which form the deceased’s notional pension property. This will require the LPRs to gather details of all the pension arrangements and to reach out to the pension scheme administrators (PSAs) to assess the value of the benefits that need to be included in the IHT calculations. Time will be of the essence.
How can clients ease the process?
For some clients, the most valuable planning step may simply be improving organisation. Before April 2027, clients may want to review whether their affairs are easy for others to understand and administer.
There are a number of things that clients can do to help their LPRs deal with their estate:
- make a will, keep it up-to-date, and stored in a known safe place
- keep a list of all pension arrangements, detailing the provider contact details and policy number (stored with the will)
- review each pension plan, consider reducing the number held by consolidating arrangements
- ensure that death benefit nominations are kept up-to-date
These steps may not reduce the tax bill on their own, but they can reduce the risk of delay, confusion and avoidable administration at death.
What LPRs may need to do
From 6 April 2027, LPRs will be liable for reporting and the payment of IHT due on unused pension funds and death benefits, and pension beneficiaries will become jointly and severally liable for any IHT due on those benefits to which they are entitled, from the point at which they are appointed. Tasks and options available to LPRs include:
- notify PSAs of the scheme member’s death, requesting the value of any unused pension funds or death benefits. In response to their consultation, the Government stated that PSAs must provide this within 4 weeks of receiving notification
- issue a withholding notice to the PSAs in order to secure funds to meet any IHT liability arising on those death benefits
- carry out IHT calculations, assessing any available nil rate band (NRB) and residence nil rate band (RNRB), and apportioning them if required
- decide whether to settle any IHT liability due on notional pension property from other assets within the estate, or issue a payment notice requiring the PSA to pay the IHT liability (where it exceeds £1,000) in respect of their benefits – payment must be made within 35 days
This is where the number of arrangements can matter. If the estate contains several pension plans, each with separate providers, separate valuations and potentially different benefit structures, the process becomes more complex.
Where consolidation may help
Clients should review their existing pension arrangements taking account of the type of scheme and whether they are currently receiving contributions or whether they are paid-up or providing deferred benefits. Active workplace pension schemes should normally be retained since they will be receiving an employer contribution which otherwise could be lost.
Defined Contribution (DC) Pensions
Transfers from DC to DC in the accumulation phase are relatively straightforward with most transactions being requested online through the receiving provider (who will then deal directly with the ceding company). The key considerations when choosing a consolidator plan:
- Price – which provider offers a suitable plan with a competitive charging structure
- Investment choice – does the plan offer access to an appropriate range of funds
- Flexibility – is a full range of flexible retirement options available within the plan (although a further switch ‘at retirement’ could be undertaken if deemed appropriate)
- Service – does the provider deliver a high level of customer service
Care should be taken to check whether any key benefits apply to the existing policy which could be lost on transfer, such as a higher protected tax-free cash entitlement, a guaranteed annuity rate, a terminal bonus (on with-profits investments), or whether penalties might apply on transfer such as an early exit charge or a market value reduction (again, on with-profits investments).
Drawdown arrangements
For clients already in drawdown there may be good reasons to explore a transfer – such as better fees and charges, or more appropriate investment options – however consolidation wasn’t seen as one of them. This is because, to be a recognised transfer and avoid unauthorised payment penalties, strict HMRC rules must be met, which preclude consolidation with other arrangements.
HMRC’s recognised transfer rules require the whole of the relevant drawdown fund to be transferred, and the receiving arrangement must be a new arrangement that contains no other sums or assets. If those conditions are not met, the transfer will not be a recognised transfer. In practice, that means a drawdown transfer does not reduce the number of arrangements held. Drawdown plans cannot simply be merged into an existing arrangement holding other assets - but each drawdown transfer-in could retain its own arrangement/segment within the overall plan or scheme with a single administrator.
Adviser tip
The planning question is not simply “can these pensions be combined?” It is whether consolidation produces a better overall outcome once cost, flexibility, protections and estate administration are all taken into account.
id
Other pensions need extra care
Defined benefits (DB) schemes:
Because they provide a guaranteed benefit in line with the scheme rules, transfers from DB schemes to DC arrangements – often to take advantage of flexible benefits – are considered safeguarded benefit transfers, most of which will require appropriate independent regulated advice (see below). It is not possible to transfer from unfunded DB schemes to a DC pension.
Safeguarded pensions
Certain types of pension benefits – those that are not money purchase or cash balance benefits – which contain a promise, including those with a guaranteed annuity rate (GAR), are considered safeguarded benefits. Where the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) exceeds £30,000, independent advice is required from an appropriately qualified adviser before any transfer can proceed. Key considerations will include:
- Member’s state of health, likely life expectancy, marital status
- Need for access (before SRD), early retirement factors, and/or need for flexible benefits
- Sponsoring employer’s risk of insolvency
- Whether the safeguarded benefits represent a relatively small proportion of the member’s retirement income
- For GARs: attractiveness of terms versus current market rates
Overseas pensions
Rules for overseas pensions have been tightened over recent years such that many of their original advantages no longer apply. There are several reasons why UK residents may want to transfer their overseas pension to a UK arrangement. Read our artcile: Why more clients are choosing to move their overseas pensions back to the UK
id
Case Study
Bill who is now aged 58 has worked for a number of employers over a forty-year career and has accumulated five different pension pots that he is aware of although he may have a sixth one from his first job. He is still working and is concerned about how the changes to IHT will affect his pensions, and the administration of his estate after death.
After reviewing his records, Bill summarises his pension provision with each of his employers:
- Employer 1 – unsure whether a pension was provided
- Employer 2 - £2,000pa deferred DB pension from age 60 (with CETV = £48,000)
- Employer 3 - £25,000 (old personal pension)
- Employer 4 - £155,000 (old DC workplace pension)
- Employer 5 - £9,000 (SIPP)
- Employer 6 - £111,000 (current DC workplace pension)
Key considerations – by each employer’s pension:
- Bill should contact his former employer if still in existence, or if taken over, reach out to the new company. Otherwise, he can use the government’s pension tracing service at www.findpensioncontacts.service.gov.uk
-
The CETV exceeds £30,000, consolidation would require advice with typical fees starting at c.£3,000. Bill needs to consider his attitude to a guaranteed pension from age 60, the increases and death benefits it offers, his state of health and likely longevity, and confidence that the scheme won’t default. If he decides to explore a transfer, he will need to be comfortable paying the fee for the advice which could still recommend that he retains his DB pension
-
This may come with high ongoing charges, could impose exit charges, may offer a very restricted range of investment funds, and its rules may restrict retirement options to annuity purchase only (with the option of a 25% tax-free cash sum). Bill needs to compare this with a modern DC pension which is likely to offer lower charges, wider choice of investment funds, and greater flexibility with retirement options. He also needs to check whether his plan offers a GAR and if so, whether the terms are attractive and meet his retirement objectives. As the plan value is less than £30,000, he would not be required to take specialist advice if he chooses to transfer away from a GAR
-
The ongoing charges, flexibility, and investment choices with the old DC workplace pension scheme (WPS) may also be less attractive than those offered by a more modern alternative. Bill should revisit his retirement objectives and compare the features and charges with those of a modern product to consider which best meets his needs
-
Bill should consider whether the features and benefits of the SIPP meet his retirement objectives. Before designating it as his consolidator (to receive transfers-in), Bill should also consider whether he may need to access some funds ahead of retirement. If he retains this plan as it is, with a value of less than £10,000 he has the option to take a ‘small pots’ lump sum without triggering the Money Purchase Annual Allowance which would otherwise limit future pension contributions
-
Bill’s current WPS is likely to offer a wide choice of investment funds, a range of ‘pension freedoms’ retirement options, within a competitive charging structure. He will also be receiving an employer contribution so he should think very carefully before ceasing his active membership. Advisers must deliver ‘good client outcomes’ under consumer duty rules and the FCA requires advisers to consider the current WPS as the destination to receive transfers-in. If an adviser makes an alternative recommendation, they must provide evidence to justify why it is more suitable than the current WPS, and not just equally suitable.
There is no ‘one solution fits all’ as each exercise needs to take into account the client’s overall objectives and how each existing pension arrangement supports them or could be improved upon. If Bill does nothing, then following his death his LPRs will have five separate scheme administrators to deal with and may overlook a further pension that was provided by employer 1. This will make the administration of the estate more burdensome than it need be and could lead to incomplete calculations. If alternatively, Bill tracks down a pension from employer 1, transfers it along with pensions from employers 3 and 4 into his current WPS, and takes a ‘small pots’ lump sum from his SIPP; his LPRs will need only to deal with his current scheme’s administrators and those of his DB scheme.
Conclusion
The inclusion of pensions within IHT calculations from April 2027 will materially increase the administrative burden on estates. Consolidation, where appropriate, can play an important role in simplifying this process — but must be balanced against the potential loss of valuable benefits and regulatory constraints.
Advisers should take a proactive approach, helping clients review their pension arrangements now to ensure that their affairs are structured as efficiently as possible ahead of the changes.
For further information and queries, please call one of our distribution team today, or refer to our TechVoice resources.