Technical Insight
Pensions: a solid choice for your clients’ retirement savings
From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds & death benefits will be subject to Inheritance Tax. Discover how advisers can help clients adapt to these changes.

id
From 6 April 2027, a major shift in pension taxation will take effect: most unused pension funds and death benefits will be drawn into the scope of Inheritance Tax (IHT). In this article, we explore why pensions are still a good investment to provide retirement funds and how advisers can adapt their planning conversations to stay ahead of the curve.
ISAs vs pensions
ISAs are perhaps the closest product to compare pensions against as both are income tax and capital gains free, and from April 2027 both will be subject to IHT.
Pensions enjoy the benefit of tax-relief on contributions. ISAs on the other hand enjoy the benefit of unlimited tax–free withdrawals along with unrestricted access to benefits.
Feature |
ISA |
Pension |
Eligibility | UK resident aged 18 + | Anyone (individual scheme rules may impose restrictions) |
Annual Contribution Limit | £20,000 | Unlimited (limit on how much qualifies for tax relief) |
Government Bonus/Tax relief on contributions | None |
Tax relief at marginal rate up to 100% of earnings or £3,600 if greater. Tax charge applies on excess over the annual allowance limit (£60,000 in 2025/26). |
Employer Contributions | None |
Unlimited Tax charge applies on excess over the annual allowance limit. |
Tax on Withdrawals | 100% tax-free |
25% tax-free, rest taxed as income at marginal rate |
Access Age | Anytime |
From age 55 (rising to 57 by 2028) Can be accessed early for those in ill health |
Wealth transfer comparisons
With pensions exposed to IHT from April 2027, and death benefits after age 75 also incurring income tax—it might appear that ISAs, which are only subject to IHT, offer a more efficient route for passing on wealth.
However, the current draft IHT proposals have confirmed that income tax will not be charged on pension funds used to pay IHT. As a result the maximum inheritance tax charge that can apply is 40%, which is the same as for the ISA.
The tax relief available on pension contributions therefore continues to offer a monetary benefit that is not available to the ISA.
An example of an individual who is 55 years of age and has £20,000 to invest
Initial Investment
ISA - £20,000
Pension - £25,000 (£20,000 plus £5,000 basic rate tax relief)
A 40% taxpayer can claim a further £5,000 tax relief from HMRC making the initial cost £15,000
A 45% taxpayer can claim a further £6,250 tax relief from HMRC making the initial cost £13,750
Long-term growth
Both investments grow tax-free. So, we can assume both the ISA and pension grow at the same rate after charges. 5% per annum growth after charges for 20 years will return:
ISA – £53,066
Pension – £66,333
The pension will accumulate more due to the higher initial investment. It will also cost less for people who are higher rate taxpayers due to the tax relief available.
Death benefits
If a client dies before age 75 both the pension (if death is on or after 6 April 2027) and the ISA will be subject to IHT. The pension will however normally return a higher amount. This is because of the tax relief that is added to the initial investment.
If the client dies after age 75 then it is still the case that both the pension and the ISA will be subject to IHT. Where IHT applies then it remains the case that a pension will normally return a higher amount than an ISA.
Where there is no IHT to apply then it will depend on the marginal tax rate of the beneficiary whether the ISA or the pension return a higher amount. This position is unchanged from today and highlights the importance of regularly reviewing nominations for death benefits.
Things to think about:
- Beneficiaries may be in peak earning years, facing higher marginal rates. A large lump sum could push them into the additional rate band, while ISA withdrawals remain tax-free.
- Nominating grandchildren to benefit could be tax efficient and prevent a growing IHT liability for the next generation.
- Nominees and Dependants aren’t usually required to draw funds immediately as a lump sum from a pension. They can leave assets in beneficiary drawdown and withdraw strategically to top up income as needed and not exceed higher tax rate thresholds. This also has the advantage of keeping the full value (after IHT) in a tax efficient pension wrapper.
- ISAs, by contrast, must be distributed (unless left to a spouse) and form part of the estate.
Keeping nominations up to date
Maintaining up to date pension nominations is crucial to make your pensions as efficient as possible. Pension benefits left to a spouse/civil partner continue to benefit from the existing exemption to IHT. This can allow more time to plan around any IHT implications, and combining assets and nil rate bands may help to mitigate IHT. This planning flexibility won’t be available for non-married partners or single people.
If your pension is paid to an adult child or cohabiting partner you have not nominated and they are not a dependant, they won’t have the ability to take beneficiary drawdown; they will therefore have to receive a lump sum.
Nominations are therefore essential not just to ensure who receives the benefits, but also to provide the necessary income tax flexibility.
Planning tip
Consolidating and transferring pensions to schemes which allow beneficiary drawdown can simplify administration and provide significant tax advantages for beneficiaries.
Are pensions still the go to strategy for retirement saving?
When it comes to retirement income, most clients take advantage of a lower tax rate in retirement than during their working years—or at worst, the same rate. The tax relief and tax-free cash options mean pensions will usually outperform ISAs as a retirement planning vehicle.
For legacy planning, most clients will see minimal impact where total estates including pensions fall within the nil rate bands, or where drawing on your pension to support your retirement naturally reduces your total estate value. But for high-net-worth individuals or those with legacy-focused plans, the new rules could require shape how pensions are positioned in estate strategies.
Key takeaways for advisers
- IHT changes - The 2027 IHT changes bring pensions and ISAs closer in tax treatment, but pensions still offer unique advantages.
- Withdrawal strategy is crucial - Beneficiaries should only draw what they need from inherited pensions. Poor planning can lead to unnecessary tax exposure.
- Pensions offer greater accumulation potential - With higher annual allowances plus tax relief at marginal rates, pensions provide more scope for long-term wealth creation.
- Review estate plans now - Encourage clients to revisit their wills, pension nominations and retirement strategies ahead of the 2027 changes to ensure optimal outcomes.
- Beneficiary advice needs - In order to ensure the most efficient tax outcomes beneficiaries may benefit from advice. Establishing that relationship in advance may help put plans into practice.
id
Contact our Distribution team
For further information and queries, please call one of our distribution team today.