Retirement Solutions
Managing illiquid assets during a BPA transaction: sponsor loans and secondary market sales the most favoured options
DB schemes unlock value with sponsor loans, secondary sales and deferred premiums to smooth BPA transitions.

id
Many Defined Benefit (DB) scheme Trustees have been able to accelerate their de-risking plans, due to significant improvements in scheme funding levels.
This raises the question: what is the best way of managing illiquid assets?
DB Trustees are considering a range of strategies to manage their illiquid holdings as they work to meet the liquidity requirements needed to secure their endgame strategy.
According to our latest DB Trustee Insight Index1 from 2024, sponsor loans were the most popular option.
Secondary market sales and deferred premiums were the next most popular options.
Alternative strategies, such as bank loans and passing assets to insurers in-specie, were also commonly considered.
id
DB Trustee considerations for
managing illiquid assets
Managing liquidity with sponsor loans
Almost two thirds (64%) of DB Trustees considering buy-in or buy-out have considered sponsor loans as a liquidity option.
This option involves loaning money against illiquid assets to fund the insurance premium upfront.
It reduces or eliminates the need for a deferred premium solution, avoids the complexity of introducing new service providers, and can potentially be set up quicker than other options.
A sponsor loan can also be more cost-effective than other options, by enabling continued run-off of illiquid asset holdings without the need to crystallise haircuts upon sale or in-specie transfer.
Unlocking value through secondary market sales
Secondary market sales were also an increasingly common strategy considered in 2024.
More than half (55%) of DB Trustees considering buy-in or buy-out considered this option, up from a little more than one-third (36%) in 20232.
This trend indicates growing opportunities within the secondary market, particularly for infrastructure, private credit, and property assets.
By exploring a secondary market sale ahead of approaching insurers for a BPA transaction, Trustees gain greater certainty over their ability to pay the premium. This also eliminates the interest costs associated with other options.
Deferred premiums provide flexibility
Almost half (45%) of DB Trustees considered deferring part of their buy-out premium in 2024 – up from one-third (34%) in 2023.
Deferred premiums allow the portion of the premium related to the illiquid assets to be paid at an agreed later date. This enables either more time for a secondary market sale, or for the illiquid assets to roll off naturally.
This can allow schemes to better manage liquidity in line with the timing of their transaction.
Alternative de-risking strategies
Some DB Trustees explored alternative options to help manage any illiquid assets. These options included bank loans or passing assets in-specie to insurers. However, these were not as popular since they may introduce more complexity and potential delays.
Around a quarter of Trustees (27%) considered bank loans for liquidity.
Meanwhile, around one-fifth (18%) looked at in-specie transfers – a sharp decline from nearly two-thirds (62%) in 2023.
Insurers have varying appetite and capabilities for taking assets in-specie. Certain asset classes such as infrastructure equity, private equity or hedge fund investments are difficult to accommodate for most, due to regulatory constraints.
Starting early
Over the last 18 months, the industry’s experience in dealing with illiquid assets has evolved significantly.
A broad range of liquidity solutions are available to help support scheme objectives – including sponsor loans and secondary market sales – with DB Trustees now able to make use of tried-and-tested market solutions.
Schemes are increasingly arriving to market with solutions for their illiquid holdings already in progress. Trustees who begin these conversations early, working with their advisers and insurers to fully assess their assets, will be best positioned to meet their de-risking objectives.
By considering all available options, Trustees can ensure that their decisions balance liquidity management and risk reduction in a cost-effective manner.
id
1Research conducted by Censuswide on behalf of Standard Life, between 7 October 2024 and 22 October 2024, among 50 DB Pension Scheme Trustees, of Schemes larger than £100 million.
2Research conducted by Censuswide on behalf of Standard Life, between 28 April 2023 and 9 May 2023, among 50 DB Pension Scheme Trustees, of Schemes larger than £100 million.
Related Articles
-
Preparedness for buy-in or buy-out remains key barrier to endgame for DB scheme trustees
Larger schemes more concerned about preparedness than a year ago.Kunal SoodMay 13, 2025
3 mins read -
Market volatility remains the biggest barrier to endgame for DB pension scheme trustees
The New DB Funding Code, trapped surplus, and attracting insurer interest are also growing concerns.Kunal SoodMarch 25, 2025
3 mins read -
Flexibility vs. security: how do we help employees balance their retirement income needs?
How do we best support employees in balancing their retirement income needs? Read our Corporate Adviser round table roundup to discover more.Workplace Thought Leadership TeamMarch 24, 2025
3 mins read